Monday, November 29, 2010
Diabetes Treatment: How Much Insulin Do You Need?
Friday, November 26, 2010
Nestlé India Plans Collaboration To Help Manage Diabetes
Retirement Reduces Fatigue, Depression
3G Wireless Technology Delivers Diabetes Health Care In Innovative Project
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Diabetes, Depression Can Be Two-Way Street
The research, conducted at Harvard University, found that study subjects who were depressed had a much higher risk of developing diabetes, and those with diabetes had a significantly higher risk of depression, compared to healthy study participants.
"This study indicates that these two conditions can influence each other and thus become a vicious cycle," said study co-author Dr. Frank Hu, a professor of nutrition and epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston. "Thus, primary prevention of diabetes is important for prevention of depression, and vice versa."
In the United States, about 10 percent of the population has diabetes and 6.7 percent of people over the age of 18 experience clinical depression every year, according to the researchers.
Symptoms of clinical depression include anxiety, feelings of hopelessness or guilt, sleeping or eating too much or too little, and loss of interest in life, people and activities.
Diabetes is characterized by high blood sugar and an inability to produce insulin. Symptoms include frequent urination, unusual thirst, blurred vision and numbness in the hands or feet.
About 95 percent of diabetes diagnoses are type 2, and often are precipitated by obesity.
The researchers found that the two can go hand in hand.
The study followed 55,000 female nurses for 10 years, gathering the data through questionnaires. Among the more than 7,400 nurses who became depressed, there was a 17 percent greater risk of developing diabetes. Those who were taking antidepressant medicines were at a 25 percent increased risk.
On the other hand, the more than 2,800 participants who developed diabetes were 29 percent more likely to become depressed, with those taking medications having an even higher risk that increased as treatment became more aggressive.
Tony Z. Tang, adjunct professor in the department of psychology at Northwestern University, said that participants who were taking medications for their conditions fared worse because their illnesses were more severe.
"None of these treatments are cures, unlike antibiotics for infections. So, depressed patients on antidepressants and diabetic patients on insulin still frequently suffer from their main symptoms," said Tang. "These patients fare worse in the long run because they were much worse than the other patients to start with."
Tang cautioned against drawing too many conclusions from the study. He noted that the correlations between diabetes and depression declined markedly when excessive weight and inactivity were controlled for in the study.
"This suggests that much of the observed correlation between depression and diabetes comes from confounding variables," he said. "In layman's terms, being fat and having an unhealthy lifestyle makes people more likely to be depressed, and [also] more likely to have diabetes."
But if research establishes a strong connection between the two illnesses it could advance treatment, Tang added.
"If a substantial causal connection is established between the two disorders, it would be rather novel and it could potentially change how we understand and treat both disorders," Tang said.
Dr. Joel Zonszein, director of the Clinical Diabetes Center at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, said establishing causal relationships is difficult in a study based on questionnaires because self-reports can be inaccurate.
"This is not ideal," he said. "It's difficult to say what is causing what, if one is causing the other. This is very difficult to elucidate."
A large, controlled, randomized study is needed, said Zonszein, who is also a professor of clinical medicine at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, in New York City.
But he praised the research, noting that tracking such as large number of subjects "over a long period of time" strengthened the findings.
Hu, also a professor of medicine at Harvard University, said the study conclusions were valid. When two conditions share the same risk factors (obesity and lack of exercise), "we can still say that the conditions are linked and one is both the cause and consequence of the other condition," he explained.
Depression can affect blood sugar levels and insulin metabolism through increased cortisol, contributing to unhealthy eating habits, weight gain and diabetes, he said.
"On the other hand, management of diabetes can cause chronic stress and strain, which in the long run, may increase risk of depression," said Hu. The two "are linked not only behaviorally, but biologically."
Thank you Ellin Hollohan/HealthDay
Monday, November 22, 2010
'Poverty A Leading Cause of Type 2 Diabetes'
But new Canadian research says that, in fact, it is living in poverty that can double or even triple the likelihood of developing the disease.
"What we know about Type 2 diabetes is not only are low-income and poor people more likely to get it, but they're also the ones that, once they get it, are much more likely to suffer complications," Prof. Dennis Raphael, one of the researchers, told CTV.ca in a telephone interview.
"And the complications from Type 2 diabetes when they're bad are really bad, whether it's amputations, or blindness, or cardiovascular disease."
Researchers from York University analyzed two sets of data: the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) and the National Population Health Survey (NPHS) for a study published in the journal Health Policy.
The first set of data showed that for men, being in the lowest-income category (earning less than $15,000 per year), doubles the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes compared to being in one of the highest-income brackets (earning more than $80,000 per year). The risk remains the same when other risk factors are taken into account, such as education, body mass index and physical activity levels.
The findings are even more striking for women in the lowest-income category. For them, the risk of developing type 2 diabetes is more than triple the risk of women in the highest-income category. When education, body mass index and physical activity levels are taken into account, the risk is still well more than double.
Results from the NPHS analysis are just as striking. Researchers found that living in poverty in the two years prior to diagnosis increased the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes by 24 per cent, a risk not changed when factoring in weight or physical activity. Living in poverty at any time increased the risk by 26 per cent.
Generally speaking, subjects who lived more often in poverty during the 12-year study period had a 41 per cent greater chance of developing the disease. When obesity and physical activity levels were taken into account, the risk remained very high, at 36 per cent.
The studies are consistent with other findings that link living conditions -- what they call the social determinants of health – with Type 2 diabetes, as well as other ailments.
Raphael, a professor of health policy and management at York, said conventional wisdom about Type 2 diabetes would suggest that once obesity, lack of physical activity and other lifestyle risk factors were taken into account, diabetes incidence rates would even out between lower- and higher-income groups.
While weight, a sedentary lifestyle and other health problems are still key risk factors, the findings suggest that health-care workers who specialize in diabetes should be paying closer attention to the socio-economic conditions that can lead to them.
"When you're in a situation where 15 per cent of kids and their families are living in poverty, and people are worried from day-to-day about their jobs and homelessness, and immigrants are not being provided with what they need to be healthy, and the evidence that suggests these are all things that contribute to the onset of Type 2 diabetes, there has to be more of a balance in how we understand the causes of illness," Raphael said.
But what is it exactly about living in poverty that contributes to type 2 diabetes?
The studies point to living conditions that put low-income adults and children at risk for myriad diseases, not just diabetes. First of all, there is the chronic stress of low-income living that can adversely affect health. The strain of being short on money and living in inadequate housing, or not having any housing at all, can spike levels of cortisol, a hormone released when the body is under stress. While cortisol helps the body deal with stress, constantly elevated levels can cause a wide range of negative side effects, such as highblood sugar levels or high blood pressure.
Residents of lower-income neighbourhoods also often find it difficult to access fresh, healthy foods and programs that promote physical activity, both of which are key to managing stress, controlling weight and, therefore, preventing disease.
Raphael also points to previous research, which suggests adverse circumstances in early childhood, from low birth weight to deprivation as a youngster, raise a child's risk of developing a number of conditions, from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases to diabetes.
Indeed, a report released this week from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia found that children who have ever lived in poverty have significantly poorer health outcomes than children who have never experienced poverty, ranging from developmental delays and psychological problems to higher rates of asthma and more frequent hospitalizations.
"So we're basically talking about systematic stress over time, lack of control that eventually leads to higher cortisol levels, among other things. Cortisol and other stuff literally messes up the ability of the body to use the insulin that's available. And it's not well understood," Raphael said.
Poor more likely to suffer complications
For another part of their study, the researchers interviewed 60 diabetes patients who reside in low-income Toronto neighbourhoods. What they learned is that the very conditions that contribute to diabetes also make it extremely difficult to manage the disease, meaning low-income patients are suffering from some of the most debilitating side effects.
Raphael and his team found that insufficient income, inadequate or insecure housing and food insecurity were key barriers to managing the disease. According to their interviews, 72 per cent of patients said they lacked the financial resources to follow the kind of diet needed to keep their diabetes in check.
Many said they had to choose between paying rent or feeding their children and managing their disease.
Michelle Westin, a community health worker with the diabetes education program of the Black Creek Community Health Centre, which services a low-income northwest Toronto neighbourhood, says she sees a number of barriers among her clients to successfully managing their diabetes.
Westin cites language as a barrier of particular concern for recent immigrants, who end up having trouble navigating the health-care system, understanding information or directions from their doctors, and communicating their needs.
Other barriers include:
- High costs of medical equipment, such as blood-sugar test strips. If patients don't have private health insurance, they are paying for many of these supplies out-of-pocket.
- Lack of access to healthy foods, and free and safe physical activity programs.
- Stress and isolation, especially for lower-income seniors, which causes blood-sugar levels to spike.
Raphael said his team's findings show that tackling broader issues of poverty -- lack of employment or under employment, housing, food security and health coverage -- are key to managing diabetes, and other ailments.
"The primary thing is basically for the government, with other sectors of society, to manage the economy in the service of all," he said.
Thank you Andrea Janus/CTV.ca News
Saturday, November 20, 2010
The Diabetes and Cancer Link
Researchers have found several connections between diabetes and cancer.
Although that may come as frightening news, some of the evidence may come as a surprise: some types of cancer rates are higher while rates of other types are lower in people with diabetes, a common medicine for type 2 may prevent cancer, and a cancer drug may help prevent type 1 diabetes.
Research Findings
A recent large-scale study following over 125,000 people with type 2 diabetes lead by Dr. Kari Hemminki of the German Cancer Research Center, found an increased risk for 24 types of cancer. The most significant rates were for pancreatic and liver cell cancers (elevated by factor 6 and more than 4 times the risk respectively compared to the general population). Since pancreatic cancer and diabetes both involve the pancreas, evidence remains unclear on whether diabetes causes or results from the cancer. Risk for cancers of the kidneys, thyroid, esophagus, small intestine, and nervous system were more than twice the rates of those without diabetes.
Other studies have found the following:
1. Meta-analyses from 15 studies and 2.5 million people with diabetes resulted in a 30 percent more likelihood of developing colorectal cancer. Women with type 2 over the age of 55 had double the risk.
2. Women with diabetes had a 20 percent greater risk of developing breast cancer. People with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy and metformin have better outcomes.
3. Metformin use is associated with an anti-cancer effect as those who take it have substantially lower cancer rates (62 percent lower risk of pancreatic cancer and up to 37 percent reduced risk for all cancers). Notably, research has also shown that people with diabetes already diagnosed with cancer may respond better to chemotherapy when treated simultaneously with metformin.
4. Those who take both Actos or Avandia and metformin have a 35 percent reduction in cancer mortality.
5. Further research is needed to better understand the risks and mechanisms that appear to link insulin with tumor growth. This finding may have more to do with insulin resistance rather than a direct effect of insulin itself.
6. Men with type 2 diabetes have a significantly lower rate of prostate cancer (may be related to lower levels of testosterone).
7. The combined effect of smoking, excessive drinking, poor diet, and physical inactivity significantly raises premature death from all causes, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. Cumulative survival, adjusted for subject age at baseline and sex, was 96 percent for those who had none of the poor health behaviors measured, compared with 85 percent for those who had all four poor health behaviors.
8. Rituxamab, a drug that treats lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis, may soon be used to help stop the destruction of pancreatic beta cells in newly diagnosed cases of type 1 diabetes. A one-time dose of Rituxamab temporarily slows or stops the destruction of the 10 or 20 percent of beta cells that type 1s typically have remaining when they are first diagnosed. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of ongoing treatments.
9. Childhood cancer survivors have double the risk of getting diabetes based on the type of treatment received (anticancer radiation therapy may damage the pancreas). Ongoing endocrine follow-up is important for these children.
Dr. Ulf Smith summarized these findings in a sobering statement, "One point has become abundantly clear … cancer must now be numbered amongst the complications of diabetes."
What You Can Do
Take this in stride. Keep in mind that self-care behaviors such as healthy eating, being active, and controlling weight either decrease or increase the risk for cancer and diabetes depending how consistent you are with them.
Until we have national guidelines on how best to incorporate this research into our standards of practice, advocate for yourself. Ask your provider about getting screened for cancer, get regular mammograms, colonoscopies, prostate exams, and the like.
Conclusion
Evidence remains unclear as to why people with diabetes have higher rates of cancer. As research continues to unfold, it is important to stay informed in order to maintain awareness, minimize risk with healthy living, discuss screening tests with your provider, and get help early on if something doesn't feel right in your body. Ongoing efforts to maintain glucose control remain paramount.
NOTE: The information is not intended to be a replacement or substitute for consultation with a qualified medical professional or for professional medical advice related to diabetes or another medical condition. Please contact your physician or medical professional with any questions and concerns about your medical condition.
Sleep Apnea Linked To Diabetes
Treating High Blood Pressure With Radio Waves
The Symplicity Catheter System – the device used to perform renal denervation - has now received TGA approval in Australia and it is anticipated that it will be available for routine clinical application within the next 12 months.
Known as ‘renal denervation', this minimally invasive day procedure has been proven to be extremely effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure – that is, blood pressure that is not responsive to medication.
Research has shown that each incremental 20/10 mmHg increase of blood pressure above normal levels is associated with a doubling of cardiovascular mortality over a 10 year period and that reducing systolic blood pressure by as little as 5 mmHg can reduce the risk of stroke by almost 30 per cent.
Professor Murray Esler, Associate Director, Cardiovascular Neurosciences at Baker IDI was the Chief Investigator for the international trial which involved 106 randomized patients in Europe and Australia across 24 separate sites.
In a presentation to the American Heart Association this week, Professor Esler will discuss the results of the trial. The key finding, which will be published simultaneously in The Lancet, was that the procedure resulted in an average blood pressure reduction of 33/11mmHg when compared to the control group that did not undergo the procedure.
The procedure is highly effective with 84 per cent of patients who underwent renal denervation experiencing a reduction in systolic blood pressure by more than 10 mmHg. The study also found that the therapy was safe, with no serious device or procedure-related events, no cardiovascular complications and no kidney-related complications.
Hypertension is the biggest killer worldwide with around 7.1 million deaths per year directly attributed to uncontrolled blood pressure. In Australia, between 25 to 30 per cent of the adult population is affected by high blood pressure and about half of those patients' blood pressure is not controlled to target through medication.
Commenting on the trial, Professor Esler said; "Combined with findings from the earlier Symplicity HTN-1 study, which demonstrated the safety and durability of the therapy out to two years, these results, show that this procedure has the potential to become a truly revolutionary treatment with the scope to significantly impact the standard of care for the large number of patients suffering from uncontrolled blood pressure."
Principle investigator Professor Markus Schlaich of Baker IDI said; "Hypertension often has no symptoms yet significantly increases a patient's risk of heart attack, stroke or death.
"We know the renal sympathetic nerves play a crucial role in blood pressure elevation and this study proves they can be specifically targeted with our novel approach. Renal denervation is a safe, quick and minimally invasive procedure that leads to a substantial and sustained blood pressure reduction without major side effects. "
In addition to hypertension, the therapy may hold promise for treating heart failure, diabetes and chronic kidney disease, conditions also characterised by elevated sympathetic nerve activity.
About the Symplicity Catheter System
The Symplicity Catheter System is used to perform a procedure termed renal denervation (RDN). In a straightforward endovascular procedure, similar to an angioplasty, the physician inserts the small, flexible Symplicity Catheter into the femoral artery in the upper thigh and threads it into the renal artery.
Once in place within the renal artery, the device delivers low-power RF energy to deactivate the surrounding renal sympathetic nerves. This, in turn, reduces hyper-activation of the sympathetic nervous system, which is often the cause of chronic hypertension.
The one-time procedure aims to permanently reduce blood pressure. RDN may also allow patients to reduce or eliminate the need for lifelong antihypertensive medications.
For more information, visit http://www.ardian.com/patients/symplicity.shtml
SOURCE: Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Saxagliptin/Metformin Combo Pill Approved By FDA
The combined pill, which is taken once a day, provides an alternative treatment for those nearly half of adult diabetes patients who are unable to control blood sugar levels . The approval was based on findings from two double-blind, 24-week, phase 3 clinical trials of saxagliptin and metformin immediate-release (IR), which were given as separate tablets, and compared with metformin IR alone.
Howard Hutchinson, chief medical officer at AstraZeneca, who developed the treatment, commented “Patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States can be taking four or five medications for various diseases and conditions, which can lead to complicated medication schedules. Kombiglyze XR combines two effective diabetes medications in a simple once-a-day dose for adult patients who need A1c reductions.”
The combination incorporates the complimentary mechanisms of saxagliptin, which is a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, with metformin, a biguanide . The therapy fights against the main defects in type 2 diabetes by increasing insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis, and also helping insulin sensitivity.
As type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease with many factors involved in its development, patients often need more than one pill to treat the multiple defects associated with the disease.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
IDF Sets Up South Asia Office In Mumbai
(Till recently, the Raheja Hospital also housed the All-India Institute of Diabetes and a great boon to all diabetics, especially from poorer sections. After the corporate healthcare chain Fortis took over Raheja Hospital last year, fees for all services offered by the hospital have been hiked, much to every poor diabetic’s dismay. So it’s strange why IDF chose to set up its office in Raheja and not a public hospital…Has IDF also become a handmaiden of profit-seeking pharma companies?)
Chief Executive Officer of the hospital Ann Keeling said India was chosen as a center due to its growing recognition as an epicenter of diabetes in the world.
“According to available data with IDF and WHO, India has 50.8 million Indians diagnosed with diabetes, and 40 million with impaired glucose tolerance, which means they are at high risk,” said Keeling.
Currently, one in eight Indians suffer from diabetes, which WHO estimates costs the Indian economy US$ 23 billion every year.
She added that 3.8 million die of diabetes annually in India-a figure considerably more than HIV casualties.
“Diabetes is a silent killer, and it is important that policy makers acknowledge this in growing economies like India and China,” said Keeling.
She also pointed out that contrary to trends in western countries, India's population was at risk in its most productive years.